Race Scenarios

Updated 27/02/23

TO THE WIRE

Currently in 2nd place with just a few laps to go. Your driver is close to the tail of the leader and sees an opportunity to make a move for the lead.

What do you tell your driver?

Stay in 2nd place and settle for a guaranteed podium finish.
Push your car to the limit and try to overtake the leader for the win.
Pull back to maintain a safe gap and conserve your car for the remaining laps.
Attempt an aggressive manoeuvre to take the lead.

Outcomes

This could lead to a secure and consistent result, allowing the driver to earn valuable points for their championship bid. It may also reduce the risk of any incidents or mistakes that could harm their position in the race. (POSITIVE)
This could lead to an exciting and aggressive race, with the potential for a thrilling victory. However, it also increases the risk of making a mistake or having a technical issue that could harm the driver's performance. (NEGATIVE)
This could be a prudent decision if the driver is struggling with their car's performance or if the track conditions are challenging. It could also help driver preserve their car for future races. (POSITIVE)
This option could lead to a dramatic and memorable moment if the manoeuvre is successful, but it also increases the risk of a collision or other on-track incident. This could harm the driver's performance and potentially the performance of other drivers as well. (NEGATIVE)

PIT STOP

Your head mechanic has noticed that one of your drivers’ fuel levels is lowered than expected and a mandatory pit stop is needed soon.

What do you tell your driver?

Push the car to the limit and try to catch up to the leaders before making the pit stop.
Order an early pit stop to ensure that they have enough fuel to finish the race.
Wait as long as possible before pitting to try and gain a track position.
Try to conserve fuel by driving more slowly and ordering the pit stop later in the race.

Outcomes

This could lead to an exciting and aggressive race, but it also increases the risk of running out of fuel or having an on-track incident. (MID)
This could allow the driver to continue racing without worrying about running out of fuel, but it also means losing time and potentially sacrificing a strong result. (POSITIVE)
This could lead to a strategic and challenging race for the driver, but it also increases the risk of running out of fuel before the end of the race. (MID)
This could be a prudent decision if the low fuel situation cannot be managed, as it would avoid the risk of retiring from the race later on due to a lack of fuel. (NEGATIVE)

DEGRADING TYRES

One of your drivers is currently in 2nd place and the other is 5th. Both drivers have different tyre strategies and the leader is starting to struggle with tyre degradation.

What do you do next?

Instruct both drivers to stay on their current strategies and hope for the best.
Ask the 2nd place driver to back off and conserve their tyres for a late race charge.
Tell the 5th-place driver to push hard and try to overtake the leader.
Call both drivers into the pits for a tyre change, sacrificing track positions for fresher tyres

Outcomes

This could result in a stable and consistent race, with the drivers continuing to perform as they have been. However, if the track or racing conditions change, this strategy may no longer be effective. (MID)
This could allow the 2nd place driver to have fresher tyres for a late race push, potentially allowing them to overtake the leader. However, if the race conditions change or the leader pulls away, this strategy may not be effective. (POSITIVE)
This could lead to an exciting and unpredictable race, with the 5th-place driver potentially making up several positions. However, it also increases the risk of incidents or mistakes that could harm the performance of the driver and other drivers on the track. (MID)
This could allow both drivers to have fresh tyres for the latter stages of the race, potentially allowing them to make up positions and challenge for a better result. However, it also means sacrificing track position and potentially losing time in the pits, making it a strategic gamble. (POSITIVE)

TEAM ORDERS

One of your drivers is currently in 1st place and the other is in 2nd. Both drivers have a similar pace and the leader is experiencing a DRS failure.

What do you do next?

Instruct both drivers to race freely and let the results play out as they may.
Ask the 1st place driver to slow down and let the 2nd place driver catch up and attempt to overtake for the lead.
Tell the 2nd place driver to push hard and overtake the leader without notifying the leader, potentially sacrificing both race positions.
Issue team orders, instructing the 2nd place driver to stay where they are and defend from behind, ensuring a 1-2 finish.

Outcomes

This could lead to an exciting and competitive race, but it also increases the risk of a collision or an on-track incident. If the driver in second place overtakes the leader, it could cause conflict within the team. (MID)
This could be a prudent decision if the DRS failure is severe and would impact the leader's performance in the remaining laps. It would also mean focusing on securing a strong result for the driver in second place. (POSITIVE)
High risk of collision, causing conflict within the team. (NEGATIVE)
This could help to ensure a strong result for the team, with the leader maintaining their position at the front of the field. However, it could also lead to resentment from the driver in second place who has been asked to sacrifice their own race position. (POSITIVE)

CONSTRUCTOR RISK

Both of your drivers are currently running in the top 5 and are in a position to challenge for the win.

What do you do next?

Instruct both drivers to drive on instinct.
Ask one of the drivers to sacrifice their own race position and support the other driver in their challenge for the win.
Tell both drivers to push hard and try to overtake the rival team’s drivers, even if it means risking a collision.
Issue team orders, instructing one of the drivers to slow down and act as a ‘road block’ to slow down the rival team’s drivers.

Outcomes

This could lead to the drivers competing against each other, potentially putting their own race positions ahead of the team’s overall performance. However, it could also lead to an exciting race and a strong result for the team. (MID)
This could help to ensure a strong result for the team and potentially a win, but it could also lead to resentment from the driver who has been asked to sacrifice their own race position. (MID)
This could lead to an exciting and aggressive race, but it also increases the risk of a collision or an on-track incident. If this happens, it could harm the team's performance and reputation. (NEGATIVE)
This could be an effective strategy if executed correctly, but it also risks angering fans and potentially breaking the rules of the sport. If the strategy doesn't work or the roadblock driver is overtaken, it could also harm the team's performance and reputation. (MID)

ASSESS DAMAGE

One of your drivers has just been involved in a crash with their teammate and has damaged the car beyond repair. The other driver is in a strong position and has a chance to win the race.

What do you do next?

Focus all efforts on getting the damaged car repaired for the next race.
Ask the remaining driver to slow down and bring the car home for valuable championship points.
Tell the remaining driver to push hard and try to win the race to make the best out of the situation.
Bring the remaining driver into the pits for an early pit stop to assess the car’s condition and make any necessary repairs

Outcomes

This could lead to a strong result for the team if the driver can continue racing without incident. However, if the stewards decide to impose penalties, it could harm the team’s performance and reputation. (MID)
This could help to ensure that the team scores points, but it also risks angering fans. If the driver who is asked to give up their position crashes later in the race, it could also harm the team's performance and reputation. (NEGATIVE)
This could lead to a safe and secure result for the team, but it also means giving up any chance of a stronger result or a win. (POSITIVE)
This could be a prudent decision if the damage to the car is severe and would impact its performance in the remaining laps, but it also means giving up any chance of a strong result in that race. (POSITIVE)

INNER TEAM TENSIONS

Your drivers have been involved in on-track incidents and exchanging harsh words with each other. The situation is starting to escalate and could impact the team’s performance in the remaining races.

What do you do next?

Ignore the situation and hope it resolves itself.
Call both drivers into a meeting and try to smooth things over and get them to focus on the remaining races.
Issue a public statement backing one of the drivers and showing your support for them.
Consider replacing one of the drivers if the situation cannot be resolved.

Outcomes

This could lead to the situation becoming more toxic and impacting the team’s performance in the remaining races. The drivers may also become more divided and it could lead to further on-track incidents. (NEGATIVE)
This could help resolve the situation and get the drivers to focus on the task at hand. If the drivers can put their differences aside and work together, it could lead to improved performance and better results for the team. (POSITIVE)
This could further escalate the situation and create even more tension within the team. The other driver may feel unsupported and become more disengaged, leading to even worse performance. (NEGATIVE)
This could help to resolve the situation and improve team morale, but it would also mean finding a replacement driver at short notice. This could be challenging and could impact the team's performance in the short term. (POSITIVE)

BUDGET

You have been faced with a difficult decision regarding the budget for the upcoming season with a limited budget.
What do you do next?

Cut costs by reducing the size of the team and technical support staff.
Invest more money into developing new technologies and innovations for the car.
Focus on maximising sponsorship and commercial partnerships to secure additional funding.
Prioritise spending on driver salaries and contracts to secure the best talent.

Outcomes

This could lead to lower operating costs, but it may also result in a reduction of technical expertise and support for the team, potentially impacting performance on the track. (MID)

The cost savings may help the team to better manage its budget, but it could also lead to a loss of morale among remaining team members and a negative impact on team dynamics. (NEGATIVE)

This could lead to a technical advantage over teams, as well as an increase in the team’s sport as an innovator in the sport. (POSITIVE)

However, investing a large portion of the budget into R&D may leave less funding available for other critical areas, such as driver salaries or track-side operations. (NEGATIVE)

This option could result in increased financial resources for the team, allowing for greater investment in other areas, such as car development or driver contracts. (POSITIVE)

Securing new sponsorships and partnerships can be a time-consuming and uncertain process, and there is no guarantee that enough funding will be obtained to cover all of the team’s needs. (NEGATIVE)

Having the best drivers on the team could lead to improved performance on track and increased success. (POSITIVE)

Paying top salaries to drivers could leave less funding available for other important areas, such as car development or operational costs. (NEGATIVE)

WONDERING #1 DRIVER

One of your star drivers has expressed interest in leaving the team at the end of the season.
What do you do next?

Offer the star driver a competitive contract, to keep them in the team.
Invest in finding and developing a new talented driver, in preparation for the star driver’s departure.
Negotiate with rival teams to arrange a transfer, in exchange for valuable assets or monetary compensation.
Take a calculated risk, by allowing the star driver to leave and focusing on improving the team’s overall performance.

Outcomes

The driver remains with the team and continues to bring success, securing further sponsorships and investment. (POSITIVE)

The cost of the new contract puts financial strain on the team, leading to a reduction in investment in other areas. (NEGATIVE)

The team successfully finds and develops a new talented driver, who brings success and helps to maintain the team’s competitiveness. (POSITIVE)

The process of finding and developing a new driver takes time and resources, leading to a dip in performance in the short term. (NEGATIVE)

The team successfully negotiates a transfer, receiving valuable assets or monetary compensation that helps to strengthen the team’s future prospects. (POSITIVE)

The process of negotiating the transfer is complicated and time-consuming, leading to distractions and disruptions for the team. (NEGATIVE)

The team successfully focuses on improving its overall performance, with improved strategies, processes, and investments leading to success. (POSITIVE)

The loss of the driver leads to a drop in performance and difficulty attracting new sponsorships and investment. (NEGATIVE)

INTERESTED DRIVER

A top driver from a rival team has expressed interest in joining your team for the next season.
What do you do next?

Negotiate with the driver and their current team to arrange a transfer.
Offer the driver a competitive contract, to secure their services for the next season.
Turn down the driver’s offer and maintain the current driver line-up.
Use the opportunity to negotiate a trade, exchanging one of the current drivers for the top driver from the rival team.

Outcomes

The team successfully negotiates a transfer and the top driver joins, bringing with them new skills and experience to help the team’s performance. (POSITIVE)

The process of negotiating the transfer is complicated and time-consuming, and it becomes difficult to find a mutually beneficial agreement. (NEGATIVE)

The top driver joins the team, bringing with them new skills and experience to help the team’s performance. (POSITIVE)

The cost of the new contract plus the financial strain on the team led to a reduction in investment in other areas. (MID)

The team remains stable and continues to build on its existing strengths, with no disruption to the current driver line-up. (POSITIVE)

The team misses out on the opportunity to bring in a new driver who could have helped improve performance. (NEGATIVE)

The team successfully negotiates a trade, bringing in a new top driver and releasing a current driver to the rival team. (POSITIVE)

The process of negotiating the trade is complicated and time-consuming, and it becomes difficult to find a mutually beneficial agreement. (NEGATIVE)

ENGINE INTEREST

Your team has received an offer from a new engine supplier, promising substantial performance gains.
What do you do next?

Accept the offer from the new engine supplier.
Reject the offer and continue with the current engine supplier.
Consider the offer and negotiate terms with the new engine supplier.

Outcomes

The team experiences significant performance gains and rises up to the championship standings, earning more points and challenging for wins and podiums. The team becomes a major player in the sport and attracts more sponsors and fans. (POSITIVE)

The new engine proves unreliable and causes several retirements and costly penalties, hurting the team’s performance and finances. The team slips down the championship standings and becomes less competitive, potentially leading to a loss of sponsors and fans. (NEGATIVE)

The team's performance remains consistent, and they continue to earn points and challenge for podiums, but they do not experience any significant gains. The team continues to be a consistent mid-field runner and maintains its relationship with its current engine supplier. (POSITIVE)

The team's performance begins to fall behind the other teams as they take advantage of the latest engine technologies, causing the team to slip down the championship standings. The team becomes less competitive and less attractive to sponsors and fans. (NEGATIVE)

The team successfully negotiates favourable terms and experiences significant performance gains, rising up the championship standings and challenging for wins and podiums. The team becomes a major player in the sport and attracts more sponsors and fans. (POSITIVE)

The negotiations fail, and the team misses the opportunity to bring in the new engine supplier. The team's performance remains unchanged, and it continues to struggle to compete at the front of the field. (NEGATIVE)

DRIVER VACANCY

Your team’s lead driver has informed you that they will not be renewing their contract for the following season.
What do you do next?

Search for a replacement driver within the current pool of drivers, offering a competitive salary and package.
Take a risk on a young, up-and-coming driver from a lower-tier motorsport series.
Consider hiring a veteran driver, with a proven track record and experience, to stabilise the team and guide the development of younger drivers.
Redeploy resources to other areas of the team, such as technology development, to improve the team’s overall performance.

Outcomes

You successfully sign a talented driver, who quickly adapts to the team and performs well, helping to secure the team's future. (POSITIVE)

Despite offering a competitive salary and package, you are unable to attract a top-performing driver, and the team struggles to match its previous level of performance. (NEGATIVE)

The young driver performs beyond expectations, quickly developing into a top performer and helping the team to achieve success. (POSITIVE)

The young driver struggles to adapt to the high-pressure environment, and the team’s performance suffers as a result. (NEGATIVE)

The veteran driver provides stability and guidance to the team, helping to maintain the team's competitiveness and success. (POSITIVE)

The veteran driver struggles to adapt to the team's current technology and style, and their presence hurts the team's performance. (NEGATIVE)

The team's technology and performance improve, leading to success on the track and a stronger future for the team. (POSITIVE)

Without a strong driver lineup, the team struggles to compete, and the future of the team becomes uncertain. (NEGATIVE)

SPONSOR PREPOSITION

Your team has been approached by a new sponsor, offering a significant sum of money in exchange for a change in livery and team branding.
What do you do next?

Accept the offer and implement the changes to the livery and branding.
Reject the offer and maintain the current livery and branding.
Negotiate for a compromise with the sponsor, preserving some elements of the current branding.
Seek alternative sources of funding.

Outcomes

The new sponsor provides the team with the necessary funds to make major improvements to the car and the team's overall performance, leading to success on the track. (POSITIVE)

The changes to the livery and branding are not well received by fans and detract from the team's identity and performance on the track. (NEGATIVE)

The team remains loyal to its current branding and identity, preserving the team's reputation and history, and the fans remain loyal to the team. (POSITIVE)

The team misses out on the opportunity to secure a significant source of funding, making it difficult for the team to remain competitive in the future. (NEGATIVE)

The team can secure a portion of the funding from the sponsor while still maintaining some elements of its identity and branding, leading to improved performance on the track. (POSITIVE)

The compromise with the sponsor is not well received by fans, and the team struggles to reconcile its previous identity with the new changes. (NEGATIVE)

The team successfully secures alternative funding, enabling it to make necessary improvements to the car and remain competitive and on track. (POSITIVE)

Despite a diligent search, the team is unable to secure alternative funding and must make significant cutbacks, affecting its competitiveness on track. (NEGATIVE)

INCIDENT FALLOUT

One of your drivers has been involved in an on-track incident, and you must decide how to handle the aftermath and any potential consequences.
What do you do next?

Publicly support the driver and issue a statement defending their actions.
Take a neutral stance and avoid making any public comments.
Criticise the driver’s actions and take disciplinary measures.
Seek an apology from the driver and consider alternative options, such as replacing them.

Outcomes

This approach can increase morale and loyalty within the team, but may also alienate other teams and drivers who view the driver's actions as unacceptable. (MID)

There may also be negative consequences if the driver is found to have acted recklessly or negligently in the incident. (NEGATIVE)

This may avoid any backlash or criticism, but could also be seen as a lack of leadership or responsibility. (MID)

This approach may not provide any resolution to the situation and could lead to further controversies. (NEGATIVE)

This approach can demonstrate the team's commitment to fair and safe driving and may be welcomed by other teams and drivers. (POSITIVE)

However, it can also harm the driver-team relationship and lead to tensions within the team. ((NEGATIVE)

This approach shows that the team is taking the incident seriously and seeks to address it responsibly. The driver may be more likely to apologize and take steps to avoid similar incidents in the future. (POSITIVE)

However, replacing the driver may result in a loss of experience and talent, and may also harm the team's morale and unity. (NEGATIVE)

LAST PLACE CONUNDRUM

Your team is currently in last place in the Constructors’ Championship, and you’re facing pressure from sponsors and stakeholders to turn things around.

What do you do?

Increase the budget for research and development to improve the car’s performance.
Sign a new technical director to lead the engineering department.
Change the team’s race strategy to prioritise reliability over speed.
Release underperforming drivers and sign new, promising drivers to the team.

Outcomes

This could result in the team being able to create a faster and more competitive car, allowing them to improve their position in the standings. (POSITIVE)

This could come with the risk of overspending and not seeing significant results, leading to financial strain on the team. (NEGATIVE)

Hiring a new technical director with a fresh perspective could bring new ideas and innovation to the team, leading to improved performance and higher standings. (POSITIVE)

On the other hand, there is also the risk of the new technical director not being a good fit for the team or not delivering the desired results. (NEGATIVE)

Focusing on reliability could help the team avoid costly mechanical failures and retirements during races, allowing them to consistently score points and improve their position in the standings. (POSITIVE)

This may also result in slower lap times and a lack of competitiveness compared to the other teams. (NEGATIVE)

Signing, new, talented drivers could bring fresh energy and skill to the team, potentially leading to improved results on the track. (POSITIVE)

There is also a risk of the new drivers not being able to perform to their potential or not fitting in well with the team culture. Releasing underperforming drivers may cause morale issues within the team. (NEGATIVE)

RAINY RACE

It's race day and it’s pouring rain. The forecast predicts that it will continue to rain throughout the race.

What do you do?

Stick to the current dry tyre strategy.
Switch to intermediate tyres.
Switch to full-wet tyres.
Mix tyre strategies between drivers.

Outcomes

This strategy leads to the drivers having less control over their cars, resulting in slower lap times. (NEGATIVE)

The rain begins to ease up and the track begins to dry, this strategy pays off, giving your team an advantage over other teams who switched to wet tyres. (POSITIVE)

This strategy pays off as the rain continues to pour and the track conditions remain consistently wet. The intermediate tyres give your drivers better control over their cars, allowing them to post faster laps and move up the field. (POSITIVE)

The rain ceases and the track begins to dry, the intermediate tyres become less effective and require another pit stop to switch back to dry tyres. (NEGATIVE)

This strategy pays off as the rain continues to pour and the track remains consistently wet. The full wet tyres give your drivers maximum control over their cars, allowing them to post faster lap times and move up the field. (POSITIVE)

This strategy requires more pit stops and hurts your team’s overall performance. (NEGATIVE)

One tyre proves to be more effective than the other, allowing one driver to move up the field whilst the other maintains a solid position. (POSITIVE)

The two strategies don’t balance out as the track conditions rapidly change, which leads to confusion and an unbalanced performance between your drivers, slower laps mean fewer points. (NEGATIVE)

INNER-TEAM TENSION

Tensions rise between your two drivers, with one leading the championship standings and the other unhappy with unequal treatment?

What do you do?

Continue to favour the leading driver.
Give equal treatment to both drivers.
Punish the underperforming driver.
Arrange a meeting to discuss the situation.

Outcomes

This could potentially secure the championship for your team. (POSITIVE)

This will further damage the relationship between the drivers and hurt the team dynamic. (NEGATIVE)

The underperforming driver feels more valued and motivated. (POSITIVE)

This could hurt the team’s chances of winning the championship if the leading driver loses momentum or feels undervalued. (NEGATIVE)

This could potentially maintain the team’s current dynamic. (POSITIVE)

This could hurt the team’s overall morale and potentially drive the second driver away from the team. (NEGATIVE)

This could potentially lead to a resolution and improved team dynamics. (POSITIVE)

This could be time-consuming and potentially lead to further tensions if a resolution isn’t reached. (NEGATIVE)

CHEATING ALLEGATIONS

Your team has been accused of cheating by a rival team.

What do you do?

Deny the allegations and refuse to comment further.
Admit to the wrongdoing and accept the consequences.
Launch your own investigation into the matter.
Blame a rogue employee for the incident.

Outcomes

Denying the allegations may help maintain the team’s reputation and prevent negative press. The team can focus on their performance on the track and try to put the incident behind them. (POSITIVE)

Denying the allegations may lead to further investigations and negative press. If evidence of cheating is found, the team’s reputation could be irreparably damaged. (NEGATIVE)

Admitting to the wrongdoing could result in severe penalties, including fines, loss of points, or even suspension from the championship. (NEGATIVE)
Launching an investigation shows the team’s commitment to fair play and can help clear their name if they are innocent. (POSITIVE)

Launching an investigation could take time and resources away from the team’s performances on the track, potentially harming their chances of success. (NEGATIVE)

Blaming a rogue employee can help shift the blame away from the team as a whole and prevent further accusations. (POSITIVE)

Blaming a rogue employee may not be believable and could lead to further scrutiny and negative press. The team’s reputation could suffer as a result. (NEGATIVE)

COMPETITOR COLLISION

One of your drivers has been involved in a collision with a competitor, causing damage to both cards.

What is your response?

Defend your driver and accuse the competitor of causing the collision.
Accept responsibility for the incident and apologise to the competitor.
Refuse to comment until the incident has been fully investigated.
Blame the track conditions or mechanical failure for the collision.

Outcomes

Defending the driver and accusing the competitor can lead to further conflict and potentially damage the team’s reputation. (NEGATIVE)
By accepting responsibility and apologising, the team can diffuse any potential tension with the competitor and avoid any additional penalties. (POSITIVE)
Refusing to comment can create suspicion and speculation, potentially leading to negative press and a damaged reputation. (NEGATIVE)
Blaming external factors for the collision may come across as making excuses and can lead to a loss of respect from fans and competitors. (NEGATIVE)

ENVIRONMENTAL CRITICISM

Your team has been criticised for not being environmentally friendly enough.

What actions do you take?

Ignore the criticism and focus on racing performance.
Make a public statement acknowledging the issue and promising to improve.
Invest in new technology to reduce the team’s carbon footprint.
Partner with a sustainable energy company to promote eco-friendliness.

Outcomes

This could further damage the team’s public image and potentially lead to a loss of fans and sponsors who prioritise environmental responsibility. (NEGATIVE)
This could improve the team’s public image and potentially attract environmentally conscious sponsors. (POSITIVE)

This may be perceived as insincere if the team does not follow through with concrete actions to improve their environmental impact. (NEGATIVE)

This could position the team as a leader in sustainability within the motorsports industry and potentially attract new fans and sponsors. (POSITIVE)
This may be costly and not yield immediate results in terms of improved racing performance, potentially leading to financial strain on the team. (NEGATIVE)

FINANCIAL DIFFICULTIES

Your team is facing financial difficulties and needs to cut costs.

What measures do you take?

Reduce staff and resources to save money.
Ask for government bailouts or support from sponsors.
Cut back on testing and development to reduce expenses.
Look for a new investor or partner to inject cash into the team.

Outcomes

By reducing staff and resources, the team can save money and potentially improve its financial situation. (POSITIVE)

Reducing staff and resources could negatively impact the team's performance and competitiveness, potentially leading to a further decline in their financial situation. (NEGATIVE)

If the government or sponsors provide the needed support, the team can continue operating and potentially recover. (POSITIVE)

If the government or sponsor support is not provided, the team may not be able to continue operating and may be forced to withdraw from the sport. (NEGATIVE)

Cutting back on testing and development could lead to a focus on efficiency and cost-effectiveness, potentially leading to improved performance and financial stability. (POSITIVE)

Cutting back on testing and development could lead to a lack of progress and innovation, potentially putting the team at a competitive disadvantage. (NEGATIVE)

Finding a new investor or partner could provide the team with the necessary funds to continue operating and potentially improve their competitiveness. (POSITIVE)

If a new investor or partner cannot be found, the team may continue to struggle financially and potentially be forced to withdraw from the sport. (NEGATIVE)

ENGINE DEVELOPMENT

Your team has been developing a new engine for the upcoming season, but it is not performing as well as expected.

What do you do?

Keep using the new engine and hope that it improves over time.
Scrap the new engine and use last year’s model instead.
Invest more resources in improving the new engine and hope for a breakthrough.
Look for a new engine supplier to provide a better alternative.

Outcomes

The new engine gradually improves over time, giving your team an advantage in the latter half of the season. (POSITIVE)

The new engine continues to underperform, costing your team valuable points and positions in races. (NEGATIVE)

Reverting to last year's model puts your team at a disadvantage compared to other teams who have upgraded their engines, resulting in poor race results and lower championship standings. (NEGATIVE)
The investment in improving the new engine pays off, and it eventually outperforms last year's model, giving your team a competitive edge. (POSITIVE)

Despite the increased investment, the new engine still underperforms, and your team is left with a significant financial loss. (NEGATIVE)

The new engine supplier provides a better alternative, giving your team a significant boost in performance. (POSITIVE)

The new engine supplier also underperforms, leaving your team with no significant performance gain and a loss of resources invested in the new engine. (NEGATIVE)

SPONSOR WORRY

Your team’s main sponsor is threatening to pull out of their contract due to poor on-track results.

What do you do?

Offer the sponsor a discount on their contract to keep them on board.
Launch a marketing campaign to promote the sponsor and increase their visibility.
Negotiate with the sponsor for a reduced contract that is more manageable for the team.
Look for a new sponsor to replace the current one.

Outcomes

The sponsor accepts the discount and remains loyal to the team, providing continued financial support. (POSITIVE)

The sponsor still decides to pull out, feeling that the discount is not enough to justify continued investment in the team. (NEGATIVE)

The marketing campaign is successful, generating increased brand recognition and sales for the sponsor. (POSITIVE)

The marketing campaign is ineffective, providing little return on investment for the sponsor and failing to address their concerns about the team’s on-track performance. (NEGATIVE)

The sponsor agrees to the reduced contract, understanding the team’s financial situation and continuing the partnership. (POSITIVE)

The sponsor is not satisfied with the reduced contract and decides to end the partnership. (NEGATIVE)

The team secures a new, more lucrative sponsorship deal that provides even greater financial support. (POSITIVE)

The team is unable to secure a new sponsor, leaving them in a precarious financial position and potentially limiting their ability to compete at the highest level. (NEGATIVE)

SPONSOR DEMANDS

A potential sponsor is interested in partnering with your team, but they have requested that one of their executives be given a role within the team.

What is your response?

Accept the condition to secure the sponsorship deal.
Decline the condition and risk losing the potential sponsor.
Offer the executive a non-management role within the team.
Negotiate with the sponsor for a compromise that benefits both parties.

Outcomes

The team secures a valuable sponsorship deal which could lead to improved financial stability and better resources for the team. (POSITIVE)

Giving a sponsor an executive role within the team could lead to conflicts of interest and interfere with the team’s decision-making process. (NEGATIVE)

The team maintains its independence and integrity, which could improve its reputation and attract other sponsors who value those qualities. (POSITIVE)

The team misses out on a potentially valuable sponsorship deal, which could lead to financial difficulties and a lack of resources for the team. (NEGATIVE)

The team secures the sponsorship deal while maintaining its independence and decision-making process. (POSITIVE)

The sponsor may not be satisfied with a non-management role and could withdraw its offer. (NEGATIVE)

The team secures the sponsorship deal while addressing the sponsor’s concerns. It could lead to a successful partnership that benefits both parties. (POSITIVE)

The negotiations could be challenging, and the sponsor may not be willing to compromise. (NEGATIVE)

SPONSOR SCANDAL

One of your team’s sponsors has been involved in a scandal that has damaged its reputation.

What do you do?

Terminate the sponsorship agreement immediately.
Continue the sponsorship but distance the team from the sponsor’s scandal.
Use the scandal to renegotiate the sponsorship agreement for better terms.
Offer the sponsor support and guidance to help them manage the fallout from the scandal.

Outcomes

The team’s reputation remains intact and they can seek out new sponsors who align better with their values. (POSITIVE)

The team may struggle financially without the support of the sponsor and may struggle to find a replacement sponsor quickly. (NEGATIVE)

The team can still benefit from the sponsor’s financial support while avoiding any negative impact on their reputation. (POSITIVE)

The association with the sponsor may still damage the team’s reputation and lead to backlash from fans or the media. (NEGATIVE)

The team can leverage the sponsor’s damaged reputation to secure better financial terms or benefits from the sponsorship. (POSITIVE)

The team may be seen as opportunistic or insensitive by using the sponsor’s scandal for their gain, which could lead to backlash from fans or the media. (NEGATIVE)

The team can show support for the sponsor during a difficult time, which may strengthen their relationship and lead to continued sponsorship in the future. (POSITIVE)

The team may be seen as condoning the sponsor’s behaviour by continuing the sponsorship, which could lead to backlash from fans or the media. (NEGATIVE)

SPONSOR REQUEST

A sponsor has requested that one of your drivers wear a specifically designed helmet with their logo prominently displayed. However, the design clashes with the team’s traditional colours and branding.

What do you do?

Refuse the sponsor’s request and risk losing their support.
Accept the sponsor’s request and compromise the team’s branding.
Negotiate with the sponsor for a compromise that works for both parties.
Look for a new sponsor that is more aligned with the team’s branding and values.

Outcomes

The sponsor may feel disrespected and withdraw their support, causing a loss in revenue for the team. This could result in financial difficulties and the inability to compete at the highest level. (NEGATIVE)
The sponsor may be pleased with the team's cooperation and increase their support. This could lead to greater revenue and resources for the team to invest in their racing performance. (POSITIVE)

The compromise may upset fans and reduce the team's credibility and reputation. It may also create tension within the team and affect driver morale. (NEGATIVE)

The sponsor may be willing to work with the team to find a compromise that benefits both parties. This could result in a stronger partnership and greater support for the team. (POSITIVE)
The team may find a sponsor that is a better fit for their branding and values, which could lead to a more positive and sustainable partnership. (POSITIVE)

It may be difficult to find a new sponsor that meets the team's requirements, and the team may lose valuable time and resources searching for a replacement. (NEGATIVE)

RAINY FORECAST

The weather forecast for the upcoming race weekend is predicting heavy rain during the race.

What is your response?

Stick with the dry tyre strategy and hope for the best.
Switch to intermediate tyres to prepare for the rain.
Opt for full-wet tyres to ensure maximum grip in wet conditions.
Delay making a decision until closer to the race.

Outcomes

The weather forecast was wrong, and the race stays dry, allowing the team to perform well on dry tyres. (POSITIVE)

The rain comes, and the team struggles on dry tyres, resulting in poor performance and potentially losing positions. (NEGATIVE)

The rain comes as predicted, and the team is well-prepared with the intermediate tyres, allowing them to perform well and potentially gain positions. (POSITIVE)

The rain doesn’t come, and the team loses positions due to slower lap times on the intermediate tyres. (NEGATIVE)

The rain comes, and the team is well-prepared with the full wet tyres, allowing them to perform exceptionally well and potentially gain a significant advantage over competitors. (POSITIVE)

The rain doesn’t come, and the team struggles with slower lap times and full-wet tyres, resulting in poor performance and potentially losing positions. (NEGATIVE)

The weather forecast changes and the team can make a more informed decision closer to the race, resulting in a better strategy and potentially better performance. (POSITIVE)

The team runs out of time to make a proper decision, resulting in a rushed strategy that may not work well in the predicted conditions, potentially leading to poor performance and losing positions. (NEGATIVE)

QUALIFYING COUNTDOWN

During qualifying, your driver has just set a time that puts them in P1, but there are still a few minutes left in the session.

What is your strategy?

Stay in the garage and save the car for the race.
Continue pushing for a faster lap time.
Pit the driver early to ensure a good starting position.
Strategise with the driver to plan their next move.

Outcomes

The car is preserved for the race, reducing the risk of damage or mechanical failure. (POSITIVE)

Other teams may set faster lap times in the remaining minutes of qualifying, pushing the driver down the grid. (NEGATIVE)

The driver may be able to improve their time and secure a better starting position. (POSITIVE)

The driver may push too hard and make a mistake, resulting in a crash or damaged car. (NEGATIVE)

The driver may be able to set a faster time on fresh tires and secure a better starting position. (POSITIVE)

Other teams may set faster lap times in the remaining minutes of qualifying, pushing the driver down the grid. (NEGATIVE)

The driver and team can work together to make the most of the remaining minutes of qualifying, potentially securing a better starting position. (POSITIVE)

The driver and team may disagree on the best course of action, resulting in a suboptimal strategy or miscommunication during the session. (NEGATIVE)

PRACTICE COLLISION

Your team’s car has suffered damage in a collision during practice, and the repairs will not be completed in time for qualifying.

What is your strategy?

Withdraw from qualifying and focus on repairing the car for the race.
Focus on optimising the car setup for the race, starting from the back of the grid.
Attempt to negotiate with the stewards for a dispensation to start the race with a modified car.

Outcomes

The team is able to fully repair the car and have it ready for the race, giving the driver a chance to compete for a strong finish. (POSITIVE)

The team is unable to repair the car in time for the race, and the driver is unable to compete. (NEGATIVE)

The team is able to make significant improvements to the car's setup, allowing the driver to make up positions during the race and potentially earn points. (POSITIVE)

The car's performance is still hindered by the damage sustained in practice, and the driver struggles to move up the field during the race. (NEGATIVE)

The stewards grant the dispensation, and the team is able to make necessary modifications to the car to make it race-ready. The driver is able to compete and potentially earn points. (POSITIVE)

The stewards do not grant the dispensation, and the team is unable to compete in the race. (NEGATIVE)

QUALIFYING POSITIONS

During qualifying, your team’s driver has set a time that puts them in P10, but there are still a few minutes left n the session.

What is your strategy?

Stay in the garage and save the car for the race.
Continue pushing for a faster lap time.
Pit the driver early to ensure a good starting position.
Strategise with the driver to plan their next move.

Outcomes

Staying in the garage may be a safe option to avoid the risk of damaging the car or tyres. (POSITIVE)

This strategy might miss out on the opportunity to improve the starting position. (NEGATIVE)

Continuing to push for a faster lap time could yield a better starting position. (POSITIVE)

This will increase the risk of damaging the car or tyres. It’s a high-risk, high-reward strategy. (NEGATIVE)

Pitting the driver early could provide a strategic advantage by securing a better starting position. (POSITIVE)

It may also risk losing track position and result in a lower grid spot. (NEGATIVE)

Strategising with the driver to plan their next move could help find the right balance between performance and safety. (POSITIVE)